Collegiate sports

NCAA Division 1

 

News Stories

Articles

Data/Stats

Links

THE EFFECTS OF THE WIN/LOSS RECORD ON COHESION

            Cohesion was measured by a Group Environment Questionnaire (GEQ). The questionnaire was administered one week prior to the announcement of those who would travel on the spring training trip, after returning home from the trip, and at the end of the season. Members of losing teams exhibited significant decreases in Attraction to Group-Task and Group Integration-Task, while perceptions of task cohesion from members of winning teams were not enhanced. Members of losing teams also exhibited significant decreases in Group Integration-Social, while members of winning teams showed no effect once again.

Results

A 2 x 3 MANOVA (Success x Time) with repeated measures on the second factor was used to evaluate the effect of team success (win/loss) on cohesion. Results indicated: (a) a significant success main effect (p = .002); (b) a significant time main effect (p = .0001); and (c) a significant Success x Time interaction (p = .0015).

Attraction to the Group - Task

The winners had significantly better ATG-T sub-scale scores than the losers at T3, the end of the regular season.. Those baseball teams with losing records indicated a lower mean score on the ATG-T sub-scale than those with a winning record. (ATG-T) from the time immediately following the spring trip (T2; M = 6.939) to the end of the season (T3; M = 5.356) was found, resulting in a difference between those baseball teams with winning records and those with losing records.

            In their conclusion they felt that losing most definitely had a direct effect on cohesion whereas winning didn’t make a change.

References

Baltzer, T. A. (1977). The effect of the winning-losing record of selected basketball teams on cohesion. University of Oregon Microforms.

Bird, A.M. (1977). Development of a model for predicting team performance. Research Quarterly, 48, 24-32.

Brawley, L. R., Carron, A. V. & Widmeyer, W. N. (1987). Assessing the cohesion of teams: Validity of the Group Environmental Questionnaire. Journal of Sport Psychology, 2, 275-294.

Carron, A. V. (1982). Cohesiveness in sport groups: Interpretations and considerations. Journal of Sport Psychology, 4, 123-138.

Carron, A. V., & Garvie, G. T. (1978). Compatibility and successful performance. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 46, 1121-1122.

Fox, E. C. (1984). Team cohesion, ability and coaches' leadership effectiveness as predictors of success in women's intercollegiate softball. University of Oregon Microforms.

Landers, D. M. & Crum, T. (1971). The effects of team success and formal structure on interpersonal relations and cohesiveness of baseball teams. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 2, 88-96.

Li, F. & Harmer, P. (1996). Confirmatory factor analysis of the group environment questionnaire with an intercollegiate sample. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 18(1), 49-63.

Stein, A. A. (1976). Conflict and cohesion: A review of literature. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 20, 143-172.

Straub, W. F. (1975). Team cohesiveness in athletics. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 6, 125-133.

Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Turner, P. J., & Smith, P. M. (1984). Failure and defeat as determinants of group cohesiveness. British Journal of Social Psychology, 23, 97111.

Widmeyer, W. N., Brawley, L. R., & Carron A. V. (1985). The measurement of cohesion in sport teams: The group environment questionnaire. London, Ontario: Sport Dynamics.

Widmeyer, W. N., & Martens, R. (1978). When cohesion predicts performance outcome in sport. Research Quarterly, 49, 372-380.

~~~~~~~~